Issue - meetings

23/1003/FUL Stable Block South West Of North Meadows, Calf Fallow Lane, Norton Conversion of 1no barn to 1no dwellinghouse to include the erection of a porch to the front, erection of 1.8m high wall with 2.4m piers and demolition of existing storage

Meeting: 07/02/2024 - Planning Committee (Item 54)

54 23/1003/FUL Stable Block South West Of North Meadows, Calf Fallow Lane, Norton Conversion of 1no barn to 1no dwellinghouse to include the erection of a porch to the front, erection of 1.8m high wall with 2.4m piers and demolition of existing storage building. pdf icon PDF 465 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Consideration was given to planning application 23/1003/FUL Stable Block South West of North Meadows, Calf Fallow Lane, Norton.

 

The application site related to an existing stable building located within an agricultural field along Calf Fallow Lane, Norton. The stable building was laid on an area of hardstanding, and to the west there were two smaller buildings which were lawful. There were also unauthorised works that had been carried out at the site which would be investigated accordingly.

 

Planning Permission was granted in January last year for a larger stable building within the adjacent field. The permission was approved on the basis that the stable block which was subject of the application to be demolished.

 

The application had been considered in full and was recommended for refusal as the scheme was contrary to planning policy as it would lead to an isolated home within the countryside which was unsustainably located. The conversion was not considered to meet any of the requirements of planning policy SD3 which supported countryside dwellings and as a result the development would lead to an erosion of the countryside and set an undesirable precedent.

 

The application was due to be presented to Committee in January as the Applicant was a Council Employee and the Scheme of Delegation stated that applications which meet the following criteria be referred to Planning Committee

 

Those cases which involve development on land owned, or in which an interest is held, by a Council Member (or their spouse/partner) or by any member of the Council staff (or their spouse/partner). An Objection representation had been received to the planning application.

 

However, an appeal had been submitted for non-determination and the application was brought to the planning committee for Members to make a decision on how they would have voted and whether members would have been minded refusing the application as per the Officer recommendation.

 

The consultees that had been notified and the comments that had been received were detailed within the main report.

 

Neighbours were notified and the comments received were detailed within the main report.

 

The planning policies and material planning considerations that were relevant to the consideration of the application were contained within the main report.

 

The Officers report concluded that the application be recommended for refusal for the reasons as specified within the main report.

 

Members were given the opportunity to ask questions / make comments. These could be summarised as follows: -

 

.  Brief discussion took place around which building on the site was to be converted as planning permission had already been granted in Jan 2023 for a larger stable building within the adjacent field. Officers confirmed this was a separate building to that which was approved in January 2023 and was due to be demolished following the grant of approval for the larger stable block in the adjacent field.

 

. Officers explained the application was outside the limits to development and would require exceptional circumstances for Officers to recommend it for approval, of which there were none.

 

A  ...  view the full minutes text for item 54