To receive evidence from:
- Children’s Services
- Public Health
- Catalyst
Minutes:
The Select Committee received a presentation from Children’s Services, Public Health and Catalyst covering:
· The HAF Team
· The programmes and eligibility
· Who is participating and how can we maximise attendance?
· Target groups
· Barriers
· How the programme is promoted?
· Early years/ schools and education settings
· Impact and Feedback
· Booking system improvements
· Links with the Council Plan
· Creating opportunities for our future workforce
· Working with families outside the programme
· The reach of the programme
Key issues highlighted and discussed were as follows:
· There were eligible children in all wards
· Ingleby Town Council ran a summer holiday scheme and there was potential to link up with the HAF programme to expand provision in Ingleby Barwick
· With regard to some of the cooking provision, it was highlighted that Morrisons had previously offered slow cookers at reduced prices, and it might be worth approaching them again for support
· The team worked closely with schools, attending parents’ evenings and schools were provided with electronic promotional packs as well as hard copy resources
· Catalyst had a three-year contract with the Council (ending on 28 February 2025). Their role was to manage providers of the programme. There were currently 31 active providers (43 had offered provision over the three year period). Only 10% of the grant could be spent on administration and the Select Committee requested a breakdown of how the administration element had been spent
· Catalyst visited every provider at least once a year for quality assurance purposes. However, feedback from the children and young people themselves was critical
· Youth United Stockton was working to build reach across partners and the programme was promoted through the Catalyst e-bulletin and the various forums and networks
· SEND was an area of low take up and was being addressed with bespoke sessions and training and awareness
· It was suggested that a comparison with other Council’s HAF provision should be carried out as part of the review to understand if other Council areas had achieved a greater reach and what learning could be applied
· Promotional literature had to follow the Council’s marketing guidelines which had proved to be restrictive. Having a dedicated social media channel would provide better profile but was also against the Council’s guidelines
· Members commented that the orange text used on the promotional literature as difficult to read
· It was an aspiration for schools to be a primary delivery partner and innovative approaches were being developed to remove practical and logistical barriers such as employing key holders to take responsibility for premises and some staff might be interested in taking on extra hours
· Following feedback from parents regarding the booking system, added search features now included age, nature of activity, provider name, location and date
· The Council was looking to develop a work experience programme with the Careers Team to create opportunities for young people aged 13 plus to participate in paid employment
· Providers understood the importance of linking and referring families into other agencies for support outside of HAF where needed
The next meeting of the Select Committee would be an informal session and would provide an opportunity to:
AGREED that the presentation be noted and the request for additional information be actioned.
Supporting documents: