To receive evidence as part of the Scrutiny Review of Disabled Facilities Grant
Minutes:
The Co-Chair of the Forum noted that 19 responses had been received, and the key issues from these included:
The survey highlighted that consistency and communication needed to be addressed in the delivery of DFG’s.
Aftercare was discussed with members noting how important this was. Members questioned whether the work was checked after completion and informed that a technical officer visits the property to check the works were completed to standard and sign off the work in conjunction with the client.
It was questioned how parents and carers find out about DFG’s, and whether the Forum promoted these. Members were informed that families were referred for a DFG by professionals e.g. social workers, but could also find out about the process by word of mouth and the Forum did circulate information on council services on a rota basis. It was further questioned whether receiving support in filling in the grant application would improve the success rate, and informed that officers did assist with applications.
Further information from one respondent regarding their experience was tabled. The respondent had received a DFG five years previously for a new garden fence and was happy with the process as well as the work that was carried out. It enabled the family to have full use of their outdoor space, without fear of injury, and gave them more privacy.
The Chair of the Committee thanked the Co-Chair of Stockton Parent Carer Forum for the survey.
The Committee also noted the services customer survey results from July – September 2024, which 24 people completed. The survey asked respondents to rate the following aspects of service on a scale of 1 – 10, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent:
Most respondents rated all aspects as 10, with only one respondent rating slightly lower (8/9) on two aspects: information and communication prior to and throughout the works. All comments received were very positive, praising the professionalism of the workers and quality of their work. Two further comments that were received via other methods were shared with the survey results, and these were also positive noting the impact that these had on their lives.
AGREED that the information be noted.
Supporting documents: