Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Evacuation Procedure PDF 183 KB
|
3. |
Declarations of Interest
|
4. |
Minutes PDF 154 KB
To approve the minutes of the
last meeting held on 13 November 2025.
|
5. |
Scrutiny Review of Reablement Service - Final Report of Adult Social Care and Health Select Committee PDF 210 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Scrutiny Review of Reablement Service - Final Report of Adult
Social Care and Health Select Committee
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report that presented the outcomes
of the Adult Social Care and Health Select Committee’s review
of Reablement Service.
‘Reablement’ is a short period of rehabilitation
which usually takes place in a person’s own home.
National evidence suggested that supporting early and safe
discharge from hospital into a reablement-type service delivers
better outcomes for individuals when compared to longer periods of
hospitalisation or immediate transfer into care at home. It was
also cost-effective for health and adult social care services, both
reducing pressure on bed-capacity in hospitals and the need for
large packages of ongoing community or residential or nursing care.
Research had continued to evidence that most people prefer to
remain in their own homes and communities.
Locally, the Reablement Service provided support for people with
poor physical or mental health to help them manage their illness /
condition by learning or re-learning the skills necessary for daily
living (so that they can remain in the community). The service
sought to ensure that people can maximise their independence when
they need it, this can include both ‘step-up’ care
(escalation of need for people already supported to live
independently) as well as ‘step-down’ (to avoid
hospital admission or ensure safe discharges). It also promoted and
supported people to be more independent and reduce the need for
long-term service provision for as long as possible.
The
offer was provided free (as mandated by the Care Act 2014) for the
person receiving support for up to a maximum of six weeks. A person
with ongoing care and support needs following this six weeks would
be financially assessed for their ongoing contribution to their
care.
There were a number of Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (SBC)
Powering Our Future (POF) projects that link to this review;
‘Supporting People to Live Independently’ and
‘Early Intervention and Prevention’. The final report
produced by the Adult Social Care and Health Select Committee would
be submitted to these workstreams for their awareness.
The
aim for this review was to identify whether the Reablement Service
offered by SBC was:
•
maximising independence for people being discharged from hospital
and living in the community.
• reducing
the need for ongoing, more intensive support in people’s own
homes and
reducing the need for admission into 24-hour care.
• working
effectively with NHS provision that supports people on a reablement
pathway.
• using
technology as effectively as possible.
The
Committee took evidence from key personnel from within the SBC
Adults, Health and Wellbeing directorate, North East and North
Cumbria Integrated Care Board (NENC ICB), North Tees and Hartlepool
NHS Foundation Trust (NTHFT), and the voluntary, community and
social enterprise (VCSE) sector (via Catalyst). Peopletoo,
commissioned by SBC to assist in assessing the impact of current
ways of working and analyse the best ...
view the full decision text for item 5.
|
|
6. |
Scrutiny Review of Muslim and Faith Burial Services - Final Report of Place Select Committee PDF 116 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Scrutiny Review of Muslim and Faith Burial Services - Final
Report of Place Select Committee
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report that presented the outcomes
of the Place Select Committee’s review of Muslim and Faith
Burial Services.
The
Council had a statutory duty to provide suitable burial provision,
and it was one of the most essential and sensitive services that
the Council provides. There could be significant social
implications if the Council was not able to offer sufficient levels
of burial provision to ensure that families can choose a grave
space in geographical areas where they had a personal preference or
local connection with. The review aimed to understand the need, as
well as the associated financial and operational requirements, for
the provisions of burial chambers/vaults within the Boroughs
cemeteries as an alternative option to the standard grave
plot.
At
the time of this meeting all burials in the Borough were conducted
in standard soil plots, with wooden frames used for Muslim burials.
Burial chambers were a preference of some members of the Muslim
community, and the Committee recognised the need for a balanced
approach that respects cultural and religious practices. The
recommendations therefore focused on extending burial provision by
offering a small number of burial rings as an optional service for
those who prefer them while maintaining traditional soil burial as
the standard option. During the review requests were received for
extending burial hours and the Committee recommended that further
investigation into the feasibility and benefit that would be added
by this is required.
The
Committee had taken evidence from Bereavement Services at
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, as well as the two local Funeral
Directors that carry out Muslim burials in the Borough. Local faith
leaders had also shared their views on the topic, and evidence had
been sought from four Local Authorities that had installed burial
chambers/vaults.
RESOLVED that:-
1.
To extend choice within the Borough’s burial provision, a
minimum of 10 concrete burial rings with the appropriate drainage
are installed in the Muslim section of Thornaby cemetery. This
should be an optional offer at an additional cost to those
purchasing the plot. The number of burial rings installed may be
extended if there is a greater demand for pre-purchasing
these.
2.
Officers carry out a further review of the operational feasibility
of extending burial hours.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
The
topic was included on the Scrutiny Work Programme for 2025-2026.
The review is now complete, and the recommendations have been
endorsed by the Place Select Committee for submission to
Cabinet.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
Midnight, 19 December 2025
|
Proper Officer
|
7. |
Financial Update and Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) PDF 372 KB
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Financial Update and Medium Term
Financial Plan (MTFP)
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on the Financial Update and
Medium Term Financial Plan
(MTFP).
Like many councils across the country, the Council was seeing
greater demand and cost pressures across council services which was
leading to a predicted larger overspend against budget by the end
of 2025/26 financial year.
The
areas that were experiencing the greatest budgetary challenges were
Adults Social Care, Children’s Social Care and Home to School
Transport. Mitigating actions had been identified since Quarter 1
to positively reduce the forecast overspend to £4.127m. Work
was continuing to identify further actions to mitigate the
overspend, however if the current forecast position materialises this would need to be met from
earmarked reserves, which was not a sustainable
approach.
Over the summer the Government launched the Fair Funding Review
2.0 consultation, which was a fundamental change to how local
authorities were funded. The Fair Funding Review 2.0 aimed to
produce a fairer, evidence-based system that targeted funding
towards areas with high deprivation and need. The Government had
published their response to the consultation alongside a Local
Government Policy Statement which gave an indication of how the
changes would impact Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council. The report
included the latest estimate of the planned changes; however, the
actual impact would not be known until the Provisional Local
Government Finance Settlement expected week commencing 15
December.
The
report also provided an indicative update to the MTFP. The emerging
position reflected rising costs and demand pressures which exceed
the expected increase in Government funding. As a result, the
projected budget gap across the MTFP had widened; £11.5m in
2026/27, £18.4m in 2027/28 and £18.7m in
2028/29.
The
scale of this gap meant that a strengthened programme of service
reviews, efficiencies and cost reductions would be required,
alongside a measured and time-limited use of reserves with a clear
replenishment strategy. Work was underway with Directors to
identify a deliverable set of proposals for the February budget,
with early emphasis on accelerating existing activity within
Powering Our Future and expanding its scope where
necessary.
Powering Our Future continued to provide the Council’s
overall framework for service transformation and improvement. It
had already delivered several tangible benefits. However, given the
heightened financial context, the programme needed to operate at a
greater pace and scale. Over the coming weeks, Directors would be
required to identify specific, evidenced savings proposals that
could be progressed through POF and the design principles for
inclusion in the 2026/27 budget, supported by clear delivery
milestones.
Further detail on potential service changes, efficiency options
and reserves strategy would be brought forward in the February
budget report. The Council would also shortly begin consultation on
the 2026/27 budget to support transparent decision-making and
ensure stakeholders can understand and comment on the choices
ahead.
The
report also contained rationale for the virement of monies between
projects ...
view the full decision text for item 7.
|
|
8. |
Review of Car Parking Charges PDF 165 KB
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Review of Car Parking Charges
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on the Review of Car Parking
Charges.
The
report outlined proposals for new car parking charges in Stockton
and Yarm town centres following a review of current charges as
agreed at July Cabinet following a motion, that was passed at the
May 2025 Council meeting, which recommended Cabinet consider
reintroducing a free first hour of parking in Yarm.
It
was recommended Cabinet approve reintroducing the free first hour
of short-stay car parking in both Yarm and Stockton town centres
and introduce new charges for subsequent hours of £2 for 1 to
2 hours and £3.50 for more than 3 hours. It was also
recommended to introduce charging £1.50 after 5pm in
Wellington Square multi-storey car park only.
RESOLVED that the new car parking charges for Stockton and Yarm
town centres be approved from 1st February 2026 as
follows:-
Monday to Saturday (9am to 5pm)
i. First
hour free
ii. £2 for 1
to 2 hours
iii.
£3.50 for 3+ hours
iv.
After 5pm £1.50 Wellington Square multi-storey car park
only
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
To
enable Cabinet to respond to the motion approved at May 2025 Full Council relating to the removal of
the free hour of short-stay car parking in Yarm. To set new car
parking charges that balance the need to cover the associated cost
of managing car parking in Stockton & Yarm town centres while
supporting the economic viability of our town centres.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
Midnight, 19 December 2025
|
Proper Officer
|
9. |
Procurement Plan/Higher Value Contracts PDF 141 KB
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Procurement Plan/Higher Value Contracts
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on Procurement Plan/Higher
Value Contracts.
The
report sought approval from Cabinet for the award of three planned
higher value contracts where the value exceeds the limit on officer
delegated authority and which were either funded within the
approved MTFP/ Capital Programme or were subject to a bid for
external funding.
The
constitution defined a range of decisions that required a specific
Cabinet approval, the financial threshold for which was set at a
level of £500k or more. Annex 1 to the report listed
contracts that exceeded the financial threshold and have not
otherwise been delegated to officers.
RESOLVED that:-
1.
The contracts listed in Annex 1 of the report be
approved.
2.
Authority be given to the relevant Director or Assistant Director
to make the specific contract award decision and any subsequent
contract variation, annual inflationary uplifts (where allowed in
the contract terms and conditions) and extension decision in
accordance with the delegations listed in Annex 1 of the
report.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
To
enable Cabinet to exercise its strategic oversight of higher value
planned procurement projects, in accordance with the
constitution.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
Midnight, 19 December 2025
|
Proper Officer
|
10. |
Minutes of Various Bodies PDF 142 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET INFORMATION ITEM
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Minutes of Various Bodies
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
In
accordance with the Council’s Constitution or previous
practice the minutes of the meeting of the bodies indicated below
were submitted to members for consideration:-
TVCA Cabinet – 26 September 2025
SSP
– 1 October 2025
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meetings detailed in the
appendices of the report be received.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
For
information.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
N/A
|
Proper Officer
|
11. |
Care Quality Commission Assurance Report PDF 161 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET INFORMATION ITEM
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Care Quality Commission Assurance Report
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on the Care Quality
Commission Assurance Report.
Stockton-on-Tees Adult Care Services were visited by CQC as part
of the local authority assurance process which was introduced in
2023. This assesses how local
authorities were performing in delivering adult social care
responsibilities under Part 1 of the Care Act.
The
final report was received in October 2025 and Stockton-on-Tees
adult services were assessed as good. (Final Report was in
Background Papers).
The
CQC report highlighted areas of strength which confirmed the
dedication and commitment of staff, partners, vision and leadership
within Adults, Health and Wellbeing as well as the wider Council.
As well as areas for development and improvement which were
welcomed and would inform the ongoing development programme within
the Directorate.
Good to Even Better was a further report that was included to
provide the overview of Adult Social Care’s response and next
steps in implementing and embedding the changes and developments
which would be needed to be even better.
On
publication day an email was sent to all Councillors with link to
the report. The findings of the CQC report had been shared with
staff teams and a celebration event held thanking the staff for
their hard work and commitment. The outcome had also been sent to
partners and people with lived experience thanking them for being
part of the assessment and subsequent successful outcome. Full
Council had acknowledged the positive outcome of the assessment.
Outcomes had been shared at regional level with the Association of
Directors of Adult Social Services. This provided regional
assurance and support as well as shared learning across the North
East.
With regard to the next steps the additional learning and areas
for development would be used to inform a detailed action plan to
ensure continuous improvement of the service, experience and
outcomes for people.
Regular oversight and assurance reporting through governance
channels would be provided as part of ongoing performance
monitoring and scrutiny.
RESOLVED that:-
1.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and outcome be
noted.
2.
The next steps on the Good to even better journey be
noted.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
For
noting only.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
N/A
|
Proper Officer
|
12. |
Tennis Court Management in Stockton on Tees PDF 185 KB
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET DECISION
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Tennis Court Management in Stockton-on-Tees
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report tennis court management in
Stockton-on-Tees.
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council owns and manages 11 public
tennis courts, across 3 key locations. In partnership with Lawn
Tennis Association (LTA) funding was received to upgrade Littleboy
Park and install gate access systems across all sites with the main
aim to improve access and long-term sustainability of local tennis
facilities. A key funding condition from LTA was a court operator
be appointed, We do Tennis (WDT) was appointed in 2023 and a
pay-to-play model was piloted at Littleboy Park for a 2-year
period. The Council had also been successful in accessing
additional funding from LTA which had allowed the recent
re-surfacing and upgrade of Ropner Park tennis courts.
The
two-year WDT contract was due to expire in April 2025. A six-month
extension was agreed to allow exploration of a new, collaborative
Tees Valley Model, involving:
SBC, Middlesbrough, Redcar & Cleveland BC. This concession
contract had expired, with the option of further extending the
original contract for 2 months whilst decisions were considered and
approvals were made moving.
It
was proposed to extend the partnership with operator, We do Tennis,
aligned to a regional Tees Valley model, which included extending
the pay to play model across all 3 sites and 65/35% income split of all court related
income.
RESOLVED that:-
1.
The extended partnership with the operator, We Do Tennis, aligned
with a Tees Valley regional model be continued.
2.
A pay-to-play model be implemented across all 3 Parks Tennis sites
to minimise financial risks and enable the longer-term
sustainability of assets.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
Partnering with We Do Tennis, as the operator, significantly
reduces financial exposure by transferring operational
responsibility, including all required maintenance, and supporting
the creation of a long-term sinking fund for future refurbishment.
Whilst the arrangement does not come without some risk, the
partnership ensures high-quality, accessible tennis provision with
minimal strain on council resources, and aligns with broader goals
to promote health, community sport, and regional collaboration. The
ongoing maintenance of these assets has proved to be challenging
due to pressures on internal resources, and lack of specialised
equipment. This resulted in the temporary closure of Ropner Park
tennis courts, prior to the recent resurfacing.
The
regeneration and management of our parks tennis courts is
highlighted as a key recommendation and action with our current
Stockton-on-Tees Playing Pitch and Outdoor Sport
Strategy.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
Midnight, 19 December 2025
|
Proper Officer
|
13. |
Childcare Sufficiency Assessment 2025 PDF 177 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET INFORMATION ITEM
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Childcare Sufficiency Assessment 2025
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on the Childcare Sufficiency
Assessment 2025.
The
report outlined how the Local Authority (LA) was meeting its duty
to secure sufficient childcare and included information about the
supply of and demand for childcare, details on any gaps in
provision and an action plan on how they would be
addressed.
The
Childcare Act 2006 and 2016 and the associated statutory guidance
for local authorities on Early Education and Childcare –
April 2025, requires Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (the Local
Authority) to secure sufficient childcare, as far as was reasonably
practicable and within available resources, for working parents, or
parents who were studying or training for employment, for children
aged 0 – 14 (or up to 18 for disabled children). Local
authorities were also required to report annually to elected
council members on how they were meeting this duty.
The
sufficiency assessment would be placed on the Stockton Information
Directory once it had been through the Cabinet process, so it was
available for parents / carers, childcare providers, and
employers.
With regard to the next steps the Council would continue to
assess sufficiency of places to ensure that parents / carers were
able to access an early years funded place or a wraparound
childcare place.
Work would continue with childcare providers and schools to
either expand or create places in areas of where there is high
demand.
RESOLVED that the report be noted.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
For
noting only.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
N/A
|
Proper Officer
|
14. |
Annual Report of the Governing Body for the Learning & Skills Service PDF 159 KB
Decision:
STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET INFORMATION ITEM
PROFORMA
Cabinet Meeting
........................................................................
11 December 2025
|
1.
|
Title of Item/Report
|
|
|
Annual Report of the Governing Body for the Learning &
Skills Service
|
|
2.
|
Record of the Decision
|
|
|
Consideration was given to a report on the Annual Report of the
Governing Body for the Learning & Skills Service.
The report provided an update
on the work of the Learning and Skills Service in supporting
residents, employers and the local community with learning
opportunities during the 24/25 academic year. The report also
demonstrated the ongoing success of the Governing Body as an
advisory committee empowered by Cabinet to provide challenge,
support and strategic oversight.
The report highlighted the
following key areas:-
-
Governance and management of the Service
-
Overview of the Learning and Skills
Service
-
Performance of the Learning and Skills
Service
-
Youth Guarantee Trailblazer Programme
RESOLVED that the report be noted.
|
|
3.
|
Reasons for the Decision
|
|
|
For
noting only.
|
|
4.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
None
|
|
5.
|
Declared (Cabinet Member) Conflicts of Interest
|
|
|
None
|
|
6.
|
Details of any Dispensations
|
|
|
None
|
|
7.
|
Date and Time by which Call In must be executed
|
|
|
N/A
|
Proper Officer
|