Venue: Meeting Room 1, Jim Cooke Suite, Church Road, Stockton - on - Tees, TS18 1TU
Contact: Judy Trainer, Democratic Services Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes: The evacuation procedure was noted. |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
To approve the minutes of the last meeting held on 13 March 2024. Minutes: AGREED that the minutes of the meeting held on 13 March 2004 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
Scrutiny Review of Narrowing the Gap in Educational Attainment PDF 674 KB To receive evidence from the regional DfE Attendance Adviser and nominated attendance hubs. Minutes: The Select Committee received a presentation from Kevin Burns, the newly appointed regional DfE Attendance Adviser.
The presentation covered:
· The new Statutory Guidance: Working Together to Improve School attendance which had been published on 29 February 2024 and was coming into force on 19 August 2024 · Progress to date: o 90% of schools now had a senior champion o 85% of schools were now sharing data on a daily basis o Two thirds of Local Authorities were either fully delivering the new expectations or had an agreed plan to do so by January 2024 o 89% of Local Authorities now had a single point of contact for schools in their area · What might be working: o Targeting Support Meetings – holding termly conversations with schools, using their attendance data to identify pupils and cohorts at risk of poor attendance and agreed targeted actions and access to services for those pupils o Multi- disciplinary support for families – proving access to early help support workers to work intensively with families to provide practical whole-family support where needed to tackle the causes of absenteeism and unblock the barriers to attendance · The focus of work in Stockton – understanding that attendance is everyone’s business: o What is the impact on the Local Authority? o What change could be made at an operational level? o What change could be made at a strategic level?
Key issues highlighted and discussed were as follows:
· Understanding of the issues/ problems specific to Stockton cohorts was essential · A need to understand how schools and the Local Authority can position resource to address the issue · Absenteeism had still not returned to pre-Covid levels · Many Local Authorities reported issues with anxiety and mental health as a key factor in absence · Members questions whether schools were adequately resourced to make up for lost learning due to Covid and to fully integrate children back into the classroom · Attendance Hubs had a role to play in sharing best practice and developing support networks · Member queried whether a “safe space” within mainstream schools could provide a stepping stone for children with additional needs to integrate back into the school system · Attendance was not as important as it used to be in Ofsted judgements. If this changed, it might encourage more schools to return to the interventions they used to employ · Schools should make adjustments to respond to the needs of the community · Home visits could have a positive impact on improving attendance · Some young people would be better placed in alternative provision · The extent to which waiting times for mental health support was impacting on attendance needed exploring locally · An absenteeism and suspension dashboard was under development and would include data from partners. According to the data, early incations were that Year 10 had the highest absenteeism for Stockton; this year group had been in Year 7 in 2020 and were likely to have been adversely affected by Covid disruption. Absenteeism also seemed to be an issue on a Friday and could possibly be ... view the full minutes text for item CYP/4/24 |
|
Chair's Update and Work Programme PDF 132 KB Minutes: It was proposed that the May meeting should be an informal session to facilitate a discussion with health colleagues. This would mean re-scheduling the summary of evidence session to June and consideration of the final report to July.
AGREED that the work programme be amended as set out above. |