Venue: Council Chamber, Dunedin House, Columbia Drive, Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BJ
Contact: Democratic Services Manager, Judy Trainer
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Evacuation Procedure Minutes: The evacuation procedure was noted. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: Councillor Sylvia Warmsley wished it to be recorded for transparency purposes only that on item 6, Financial Update and Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP), she was a member of the Thornaby Town Deal Board.
For transparency purposes, Councillor Jim Beall declared an interest in agenda item 7 as his late mother had been a recipient of the reablement service.
For transparency purposes, Councillor Shakeel Hussain declared an interest in agenda item 8 as he was a Muslim Funeral Director who had taken part in the review of the Muslim and Faith Burial Services. |
|
|
To approve the minutes of the last meeting held on 18 November 2025 (to follow) Minutes: AGREED that the minutes of the meeting on 18th November 2025 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
|
Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Public Report Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered a report which provided details of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Public, which had formally been considered by Cabinet, with a request that the matter be further considered through Executive Scrutiny Committee. Members were advised that letters of apology had been sent to the ninety-nine families affected. Of the 99, 98 reviews had in fact taken place with one planned. The practice of issuing “no change” letters had been discontinued and all families affected had now had a full annual review. Members were advised of the introduction of a robust process going forward, including the checks that would be involved. It was noted that the total redress of £7,750 had been funded through the special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) budget as the funding came from a ring-fenced grant which included administration costs. This payment was confirmed as a one-off cost and did not affect the Council’s Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP). The Committee was informed that the service was collaborating with Digital Teams to develop a more digitalised process. Officers advised that staff learning and development arrangements were in place. AGREED that the report be noted.
|
|
|
Financial Update and Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) Minutes: The Committee considered a report which provided a financial update and an indicative position for the Medium-term financial plan (MTFP). The report identified rising cost and demand pressures that exceeded expected increases in government funding, which resulted in a widening projected budget gap £11.5m in 2026/27, and £18.4m in 2027/28.
· Summary: The areas that experienced the greatest budgetary challenges were Adults Social Care, Children’s Social Care and Home to School Transport. Mitigating actions had been identified since Quarter 1 to positively reduce the forecast overspend to £4.127m.
· General Fund: The included table showed a projected budget outturn position for each Directorate in 2025/26, based on information to 30 September 2025. A projected overspend of £4.1m was reported at quarter 2, compared to £1.7m at quarter 1, with the reasons for any significant variances from those previously reported subsequently summarised for each SBC directorate.
It was reported that growing demand for council services and increased cost of delivery had placed pressure on several budgets. Following the projected overspend at Quarter 1, senior officers had undertaken an urgent exercise to identify mitigating actions to improve the in-year financial position. This exercise had identified £2.543m of savings, resulting in a revised forecast overspend of £4.127m.
· Dedicated Schools Grant: The grant deficit was held in a separate ring-fenced account, which stood at £6.72m on 31 March 2025 and was forecast to increase to £11.37m by 31 March 2026. The main reasons for the estimated growth in the number of children with SEND and increase in complexity of need. There is specific accounting treatment for this deficit which must be held in a separate ring-fenced account within the Council’s overall financial statements.
· Powering our Futures – Progress Towards Closing the Budget Gap: The programme, particularly the transformation mission, had identified savings of £5.8m by 2026/27, which were included within the budget report in February 2025. Further savings have subsequently been identified including the review of the fostering offer.
· Medium-term financial plan 2025-2028: Due to ongoing growth in demand and costs for Adults and Children’s Services the Council is projecting a significant budget gap across the medium term of £11.5m in 2026/27, £18.4m in 2027/28 and £18.7m in 2028/29. This is an estimate of the projected position and will be confirmed in the budget report to Council in February following the Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement.
The report also presented an update on the Capital Programme.
In response, Committee comments / questions were recorded as follows:
· Members queried why the Adults Social Care budget in the report (£107m) differed from the figure included in the budget consultation (£84m) and the figure referenced in the CQC report (£6.6m). Officers advised that the report included the full directorate, while the budget consultation related to Adults Social Care only, and that a reconciliation would be provided.
· The additional grant from the DfE including grants to fund additional national insurance costs had been received later in the year.
· Members referred to the predicted savings of £5.8m from the Powering our ... view the full minutes text for item ESC/38/25 |
|
|
Scrutiny Review of Reablement Service Final Report of the Adult Social Care and Health Select Committee – Scrutiny Review of Reablement Service (Executive Summary for Information) Minutes: Members received the Executive Summary from the Adult Social Care and Health Select Committee’s final report following its scrutiny review of the Reablement Service. The review highlighted positive outcomes for people supported by the service and identified opportunities to further strengthen provision, including the use of innovative technologies. Members noted that the Committee’s review had taken place during a period of rapid change and coincided with separate reviews of the service via the Council’s Powering Our Future (POF) initiative and an external consultant (Peopletoo). Difficulties had been experienced in receiving updates regarding POF-related developments, and issues in the sharing of the final Peopletoo findings led to the agreement and publication of the Committee’s final report being delayed. The Committee’s final report had been considered by Cabinet in December 2025, at which time all recommendations were accepted. It was noted that implementation had progressed at pace and that the report had been well received. Members acknowledged that the reablement service continued to respond effectively to changing needs and was valued for its focus on supporting people in a flexible and adaptable way. AGREED that the Executive Summary be noted.
|
|
|
Scrutiny Review of Muslim and Faith Burial Services Final Report of the People Select Committee – Scrutiny Review of Muslim and Faith Burial Sevices (Executive Summary for Information) Minutes: The Committee considered the Executive Summary from the Place Select Committee’s final report following its Scrutiny Review of Muslim and Faith Burial Services. Members expressed their thanks for the engagement and representation of the Muslim community throughout the review process. It was acknowledged that the recommended installation of burial rings would give more choice to faith groups. Members noted that Cabinet had accepted the recommendation to pre-purchase burial rings on a full cost-recovery basis, ensuring there would be no budgetary impact on the local authority. It was reported that funeral directors had requested an extension to the permitted burial times beyond 2.30 pm, to better support the requirement for same-day burials. Members were advised that the Committee recommended this request be reviewed by officers. AGREED that the Executive Summary be noted.
|
|
|
Crustaceans Death Working Group - Terms of Reference Additional documents: Minutes: Members received an update on the Crustaceans Death Working Group. Stockton-on-Tees had participated in the Working Group since 2022, and the Working Group had concluded their investigation in June 2025. The Working Group met informally in July 2025 to discuss promotion of the report and the future of the Group. Several representatives expressed their wish to continue the work of the Group and therefore the terms of reference had been revised. The Groups new remit was to monitor the implementation of the recommendations, liaising with key stakeholders and lobbying relevant decision makers, for a period of 12 months. Executive Scrutiny Committee was asked if they wished to continue to appoint a representative to the Working Group. AGREED that no appointment be made to the working group at the present time, but updates be requested from Redcar & Cleveland Council.
|
|
|
Minutes: AGREED that the Forward Plan be noted. |
|
|
Chairs' Updates Minutes: Members were provided with updates from the Chairs of each Select Committee. Areas highlighted included:
ADULT SOCIAL CARE AND HEALTH SELECT COMMITTEE
Scrutiny Review - Reablement Service: The final report was presented and endorsed by Cabinet. A draft Action Plan in relation to the report’s recommendations was to be considered for approval at the Committee meeting in February 2026. Members noted that an annual report was presented by the SBC Director of Public Health at the last Committee meeting in November 2025.
Scrutiny Review - Stockton-on-Tees Adult Carers Support Service: The last evidence-gathering session had taken place in November 2025, featuring contributions from Eastern Ravens Trust and Mobilise, an external online business working with SBC. A final evidence session was planned to include feedback from carers, external scrutiny of SBC carer-related provision, and other approaches outside the Borough. An informal session was scheduled to consider a summary of all information received.
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE SELECT COMMITTEE
Monitoring - The December meeting would receive updates on the progress and impact of recommendations 6, 7, 10 and 13 following the Committee’s Appreciative Inquiry into Narrowing the Gap in Educational Attainment.
Scrutiny Review - Children Not in School: Evidence was received in relation to children educated through Home and Hospital provision, Elective Home Education and Children Missing from Education.
COMMUNITY SAFETY SELECT COMMITTEE
Scrutiny Review - Children Affected by Domestic Abuse: Submissions from Cleveland Police were scheduled for consideration and further partner input planned for January 2026. The meeting in January 2026 was to include contributions from the Hartlepool and Stockton-on-Tees Safeguarding Children Partnership, alongside local Housing Services, with representatives from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council and Thirteen Housing Group.
PEOPLE SELECT COMMITTEE
Scrutiny Review - Partnership Working in Early Help: The Committee had agreed its final report and recommendations in December. Evidence had been heard from partner organisations, service users, and the Parent and Carer Forum. The review highlighted the need for partners to be supported in delivering Early Help, with improvements in communication, governance, and joint training. The report was scheduled for submission to Cabinet in January, with an executive summary to be shared with Executive Scrutiny.
Scrutiny Review - Post 16 Provision: A tripartite meeting had considered a draft scope and project plan for the review. The review aimed to assess current provision within the Borough and inform the Post 16 enrichment strategy. The scope and project plan would be presented for discussion and agreement at the January meeting.
PLACE SELECT COMMITTEE
Scrutiny Review - Capital Projects: Evidence highlighted that regeneration held the largest budget share, Community, Environment and Culture had the most programmes, and Transportation managed the highest number of projects, with most of the funding coming from grants and contributions. The review was scheduled to report to Cabinet in May 2026.
Monitoring: Implementation of recommendations from the Domestic Waste and Recycling review were reported to be on track, with ongoing engagement and implementation planned from January 2026. The first update on the Affordable Housing review noted progress on a ... view the full minutes text for item ESC/43/25 |
|
|
Chair's Update and Executive Scrutiny Work Programme Minutes: AGREED that the Chair’s Update and Executive Scrutiny Committee Work Programme be noted. |