Venue: Jim Cooke Conference Suite, Stockton Central Library, Church Road, Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 1TU
Contact: Scrutiny Support Officer Rachel Harrison
Items
No. |
Item |
PEO/23/24 |
Evacuation Procedure PDF 9 KB
Minutes:
|
PEO/24/24 |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
|
PEO/25/24 |
Minutes PDF 99 KB
To approve the minutes of the
last meeting held on 8 July 2024
Minutes:
|
PEO/26/24 |
Scrutiny Review of Disabled Facilities Grant PDF 94 KB
To receive evidence from Council Officers as
part of the Scrutiny Review of Disabled Facilities Grant
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received a presentation from the
Occupational Therapy (OT) Team Manager. The presentation
covered:
- SBC OT Service overview and missions
statement
- Legal Duties
- OT provisions and process
- The impact on health and wellbeing
and measuring success
- Effects of long waiting lists and
non-provision, including the financial impact
- Demand on service
Key issues discussed included:
- The OT assessments mainly took place
in a person’s home, although they could take place in
residential care setting, day care settings and local prison
too.
- Comparisons from before and after
the person came to the OT service were made to measure the impact
of OT interventions on their personalised outcomes.
- Reduction in the cost of the care
package was being achieved by in-depth review of such care packages
by the OT assessor. However, the main objective of undertaking a
review of the care package was to make this personalised and less
intrusive e.g. tailored to the individual.
- The OT service worked with Tees
Valley Home Finder and Registered Housing Providers to ensure those
on the housing register were applying for housing that met their
needs. A long term implication of non or delay in provision of
DFG’s included the need for re-housing and the shortage of
housing and difficulty in finding suitable properties for a persons
need was noted.
- Members questioned whether,
following an extension built via DFG, a person could apply again
for another DFG if their family expanded, or they moved properties.
Officers explained that the design of extensions and/or adaptations
had to meet the need of the person and
they could apply again if their needs changed.
- It was questioned whether
arrangements were in place to return small items people may require
on short term basis such as crutches, and while this was not the
responsibility of officers at the meeting they were aware that
there was a system in place for returning these.
- Discussion took place regarding the
design of new housing and ensuring that these were built to meet
the needs of older people, which would ensure they did not require
as many adaptations in future. It was noted that this would be a
planning issue and changes would have to
be made with the planning process. However, there were regulations
regarding the placing of plug sockets and door widths.
- It was noted that the OT would put
short term measures in place immediately to assist the person while
there were awaiting a DFG.
- Members questioned the reason for
the increase in demand for OT services and informed that the team
had improved how they promoted their services and became more
accessible. Additionally, they had built good working relationships
with Tees Valley Homefinder, Thirteen, and care services therefore
received more referrals.
- The financial impact for waiting for
adaptation was noted, and Officers explained that the cost for a
day in hospital was approximate. It was questioned why someone
would spend one day in hospital and explained that this would be an
extra day stay in hospital which may be ...
view the full minutes text for item PEO/26/24
|
PEO/27/24 |
Chair's Update and Select Committee work Programme 2024-2025 PDF 141 KB
Minutes:
|